Moving fast often means moving wrong

Enjoying this post?

Subscribe to get more free content like this delivered to your inbox.

    I won't spam you. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Picture of Vaughan Broderick
    Vaughan Broderick

    Your CEO wants fast results for a decade-old issue.

    The issue is complex, locked in systems and culture.

    Rushed for the leadership meeting, you deliver quick results. But those results often end up misaligned with the deeper issues at hand.

    Often, you find yourself back at the starting point, realising nothing changed. The cycle of stalled initiatives highlights a gap between effort and lasting progress.

    Under pressure to move quickly, teams often mistake data collection for genuine understanding, missing the important bridge between knowing facts and grasping the real problem.

    Teams typically survey stakeholders, gather data, and present ‘facts’. Eventually, someone claims, “We’ve done enough research,” pushing the process forward.

    Gathering data isn’t the same as generating insight. The missing transition: asking what problem sits behind the problem. Most teams skip this, leading to superficial solutions and the belief in the ‘true but useless’ pie charts.

    As a result, they build a solution to the obvious problem, not the real one. This common mistake stems from ignoring the transition from symptoms to root causes.

    Most businesses say cost is the barrier to innovation. Yet the real obstacle is not the innovation’s cost, but the consequence of addressing the wrong problem. An effect of unclear transitions in problem-solving.

    A failed innovation doesn’t just waste the investment. It creates compounding scar tissue. Teams become evermore cynical. Stakeholders lose trust and confidence. The next initiative faces even more lethargy and resistance.

    This is the real price of chasing short-term outcomes.

    You can’t ignore deadlines. You need to face what moving faster actually costs.

    Here’s the thing: most executives don’t want expensive guessing. They want informed speed.

    The difference is in the work most teams skip, the tools that turn data into insight, and the discipline to ask what lies behind the obvious problem.

    Complex problems take years to create. You won’t solve them fast, but you can solve them well.

    Commit to understanding the real issue before you act. Prioritise insight over speed. Real change starts there.

    Related Posts:

    Innovations Missing Link: Behaviour Change

    This week, we uncover innovation’s best-kept secret – the EAST Framework. Change isn’t merely a process; it’s deeply ingrained behaviour shift. Let’s explore how this simple yet profound approach can revolutionise your approach to innovation. If you find this insight valuable, don’t hesitate to share it with your network. Let’s dive in. Read time: 2.5 minutes Community Focus Each week I’ll bring you organisations and experts doing great work to support entrepreneurs, innovators and leaders….

    Read More »

    How to Build an Anti-fragile Organisation

    When we experience a black swan event like the 2008 global financial crisis, we are surprised at the significant impact and yet rationalise how predictable it was. Whether a significant event is a black swan or a more likely disruptive event, such as the recent pandemic or a new market competitor, complex systems have many interdependencies that often react unpredictably to stressors. In response to a visible disruptive event, we often overreact, which can disproportionately negatively impact…

    Read More »